<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for UtterPower.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.utterpower.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.utterpower.com</link>
	<description>Alternative Energy Solutions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 02:30:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pension Fund Raids, as a DIYer, you know about cause and effect, watch as it happens! by CHRIS</title>
		<link>http://www.utterpower.com/new-pension-fund-raids/comment-page-1/#comment-8031</link>
		<dc:creator>CHRIS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 02:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.utterpower.com/?p=4186#comment-8031</guid>
		<description>I cannot be convinced they are not doing this on purpose. Its been planned for decades. It may be wise to spend what money we have getting a bit more self sufficient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cannot be convinced they are not doing this on purpose. Its been planned for decades. It may be wise to spend what money we have getting a bit more self sufficient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Alamosa HCPV, How the DOE set the terms for the game. by Bill Knighton</title>
		<link>http://www.utterpower.com/alamosa-hcpv-how-the-doe-set-the-terms-for-the-game/comment-page-1/#comment-7994</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Knighton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.utterpower.com/?p=4167#comment-7994</guid>
		<description>It makes me wonder about the tens of billions that have been spent on fusion research.  I mean if this is the same process that funds it and there is a reputable and large physics community validating the process then where would be the feedback that moderates it?   Financial failure plays no role since nobody is trying to make any money. And net energy production is always 10-15 years away.  And then what if it did work perfectly?  A new fission plant is 9 billion dollars and rising even though they&#039;ve had them commercially for 50 years.  Would a new fusion plant be a few hundred billion maybe?  Round it off and make it an even trillion.  I think trillion is the new billion anyway.  The pentagon says maintenance on the 2 or 3 thousand joint strike fighters will top 1 trillion so let&#039;s say there were actually enough of these fusion plants built to fix our co2 emmisions.  What would maintence be on 2 or 3 thousand?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It makes me wonder about the tens of billions that have been spent on fusion research.  I mean if this is the same process that funds it and there is a reputable and large physics community validating the process then where would be the feedback that moderates it?   Financial failure plays no role since nobody is trying to make any money. And net energy production is always 10-15 years away.  And then what if it did work perfectly?  A new fission plant is 9 billion dollars and rising even though they&#8217;ve had them commercially for 50 years.  Would a new fusion plant be a few hundred billion maybe?  Round it off and make it an even trillion.  I think trillion is the new billion anyway.  The pentagon says maintenance on the 2 or 3 thousand joint strike fighters will top 1 trillion so let&#8217;s say there were actually enough of these fusion plants built to fix our co2 emmisions.  What would maintence be on 2 or 3 thousand?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Alamosa HCPV, How the DOE set the terms for the game. by Elden</title>
		<link>http://www.utterpower.com/alamosa-hcpv-how-the-doe-set-the-terms-for-the-game/comment-page-1/#comment-7993</link>
		<dc:creator>Elden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.utterpower.com/?p=4167#comment-7993</guid>
		<description>The plot thickens.......http://dailycaller.com/2012/01/30/more-solyndra-style-failure-obama-tied-amonix-inc-lays-off-most-of-company/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The plot thickens&#8230;&#8230;.<a href="http://dailycaller.com/2012/01/30/more-solyndra-style-failure-obama-tied-amonix-inc-lays-off-most-of-company/" rel="nofollow">http://dailycaller.com/2012/01/30/more-solyndra-style-failure-obama-tied-amonix-inc-lays-off-most-of-company/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 1/26/2012  The Next Solyndra? Amonix by George B.</title>
		<link>http://www.utterpower.com/1262012-the-next-solyndra-amonix/comment-page-1/#comment-7902</link>
		<dc:creator>George B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 05:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.utterpower.com/?p=4113#comment-7902</guid>
		<description>Keep reading Comments Elden, I hear that Amonix or the Alamosa project no matter how insane it was, has a loan of 90 million underwritten by the US Government, so we&#039;re on the hook again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep reading Comments Elden, I hear that Amonix or the Alamosa project no matter how insane it was, has a loan of 90 million underwritten by the US Government, so we&#8217;re on the hook again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 1/26/2012  The Next Solyndra? Amonix by George B.</title>
		<link>http://www.utterpower.com/1262012-the-next-solyndra-amonix/comment-page-1/#comment-7901</link>
		<dc:creator>George B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 05:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.utterpower.com/?p=4113#comment-7901</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s starting to make sense now.  It&#039;s been rumored that the  U.S. Goverment underwrote loans to Amonix and or for the Alamosa Project!  Since the US Taxpayer is the dupe again, there&#039;s really little concern about whether any aspect of this project is viable or not, a lot fo people likely got rich doing what they did, and you get to hold the bag. 

I&#039;m sure many of us can now understand just how helpless the Russian People felt as their Government forced them to do crazy things during the cold war years. This is absolutely the same thing, perhaps the real difference is the Russian people knew they were getting screwed, and about half the American people are too dumb to figure it out. Remember, your Government has no money, they must take it from you before they can hand it to the Cons who engineer stupid stuff like the Alamosa install.

This may be the loan for this VERY expensive install: https://lpo.energy.gov/?projects=cogentrix-of-alamosa-llc
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s starting to make sense now.  It&#8217;s been rumored that the  U.S. Goverment underwrote loans to Amonix and or for the Alamosa Project!  Since the US Taxpayer is the dupe again, there&#8217;s really little concern about whether any aspect of this project is viable or not, a lot fo people likely got rich doing what they did, and you get to hold the bag. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure many of us can now understand just how helpless the Russian People felt as their Government forced them to do crazy things during the cold war years. This is absolutely the same thing, perhaps the real difference is the Russian people knew they were getting screwed, and about half the American people are too dumb to figure it out. Remember, your Government has no money, they must take it from you before they can hand it to the Cons who engineer stupid stuff like the Alamosa install.</p>
<p>This may be the loan for this VERY expensive install: <a href="https://lpo.energy.gov/?projects=cogentrix-of-alamosa-llc" rel="nofollow">https://lpo.energy.gov/?projects=cogentrix-of-alamosa-llc</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 1/26/2012  The Next Solyndra? Amonix by George B.</title>
		<link>http://www.utterpower.com/1262012-the-next-solyndra-amonix/comment-page-1/#comment-7895</link>
		<dc:creator>George B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 01:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.utterpower.com/?p=4113#comment-7895</guid>
		<description>Hello Darren Hill!
Good to hear from you, I&#039;m hoping you are happy and well. For others who might read your post, I&#039;ll just remind folks that the real learning comes when you grab the chalk and work out the economics in front of the class, they&#039;ll keep you honest. As an equipment dealer and Installer in Northland, I know YOU are usually asked to give veritable evidence that your designs provide the best economic benefit to your customers. I have learned over the years to seek hands on advice from people like yourself  and to get my own hands on the equipment when possible.  There&#039;s little chance I&#039;d take the advice of an Investment Fund Manager as to what type of solar system to buy. The one link I provided in the comments pretty well defines the technology that propelled Amonix into the limelight, apparently there’s a concentrator layer in front of those panels creating a claimed 26 percent efficiency, I didn&#039;t take time to read if this was an increase per square area, or defined in some other way, but we both understand that with a $250,000 tracker, it wasn&#039;t cheapest per KWH! AND we need recall that our Fund Manager specifically mentioned that Amonix was the leader in efficiency in their targeted markets, I will quote: &quot;Amonix CPV systems have emerged as the lowest cost solar technology for sunny and dry environments,&quot; said Ben Kortlang, Partner of Kleiner, Perkins, Caufield &amp; Byers&quot;. Sunny and dry usually equates to desert, or areas where the cost of land is normally a minor part of the installation cost, so who cares if your system uses a percentage more square area per Kilo Watt Hour, and certainly not at Alamosa.

Perhaps one of the more interesting questions... will this Alamosa site employ the team of maintenance personnel, parts, trucks, lifts, and other equipment necessary to keep these trackers running as part of the plan? It appears the Mayor of Alamosa thinks the layoffs at Amonix are temporary. I figure if Amonix made the decision to pay $250,000 for the trackers, and sell them for $200,000 to their Customer, then  there’s likely other problems that will surface, but hey, I’m  just a bone head that is guided by a basic need to know the most important bit of hard data,   the real cost per Kilo Watt Hour over the realistic life of the equipment including maintenance and up keep.

I have told a story about a certain Dr. Francisco Rodriguez-Sanchez in Mexico who wrote an incredibly brilliant summary of how important it is to produce products that provide a ‘veritable’ return on investment  for the stake holders.  ‘Seb’, as his friends call him went to lay out how this evidence was to be measured in the research he was doing in Mali. I need put that story up for all of us to keep in mind, but I think some of our elected officals need take note of the concept ASAP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Darren Hill!<br />
Good to hear from you, I&#8217;m hoping you are happy and well. For others who might read your post, I&#8217;ll just remind folks that the real learning comes when you grab the chalk and work out the economics in front of the class, they&#8217;ll keep you honest. As an equipment dealer and Installer in Northland, I know YOU are usually asked to give veritable evidence that your designs provide the best economic benefit to your customers. I have learned over the years to seek hands on advice from people like yourself  and to get my own hands on the equipment when possible.  There&#8217;s little chance I&#8217;d take the advice of an Investment Fund Manager as to what type of solar system to buy. The one link I provided in the comments pretty well defines the technology that propelled Amonix into the limelight, apparently there’s a concentrator layer in front of those panels creating a claimed 26 percent efficiency, I didn&#8217;t take time to read if this was an increase per square area, or defined in some other way, but we both understand that with a $250,000 tracker, it wasn&#8217;t cheapest per KWH! AND we need recall that our Fund Manager specifically mentioned that Amonix was the leader in efficiency in their targeted markets, I will quote: &#8220;Amonix CPV systems have emerged as the lowest cost solar technology for sunny and dry environments,&#8221; said Ben Kortlang, Partner of Kleiner, Perkins, Caufield &#038; Byers&#8221;. Sunny and dry usually equates to desert, or areas where the cost of land is normally a minor part of the installation cost, so who cares if your system uses a percentage more square area per Kilo Watt Hour, and certainly not at Alamosa.</p>
<p>Perhaps one of the more interesting questions&#8230; will this Alamosa site employ the team of maintenance personnel, parts, trucks, lifts, and other equipment necessary to keep these trackers running as part of the plan? It appears the Mayor of Alamosa thinks the layoffs at Amonix are temporary. I figure if Amonix made the decision to pay $250,000 for the trackers, and sell them for $200,000 to their Customer, then  there’s likely other problems that will surface, but hey, I’m  just a bone head that is guided by a basic need to know the most important bit of hard data,   the real cost per Kilo Watt Hour over the realistic life of the equipment including maintenance and up keep.</p>
<p>I have told a story about a certain Dr. Francisco Rodriguez-Sanchez in Mexico who wrote an incredibly brilliant summary of how important it is to produce products that provide a ‘veritable’ return on investment  for the stake holders.  ‘Seb’, as his friends call him went to lay out how this evidence was to be measured in the research he was doing in Mali. I need put that story up for all of us to keep in mind, but I think some of our elected officals need take note of the concept ASAP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 1/26/2012  The Next Solyndra? Amonix by Darren Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.utterpower.com/1262012-the-next-solyndra-amonix/comment-page-1/#comment-7890</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 23:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.utterpower.com/?p=4113#comment-7890</guid>
		<description>I agree with your comments re trackers George
why build a mechanical liability and complexity into some thing as reliable as a solar array?
If you want more power just add more (now relatively cheap) P.V. panels and move on.
Cost benefit analysis shows for a home system shows for the price of a tracker and its foundations you can add enough panels to a static array for near if not the same performance and best of all its KISS. I cant imagine a large commercial array such as these would be any different, maybe there are some economies of scale that have a bearing on it?  I would be surprised. The only time a tracker is warranted, I feel, is when there are space constrictions</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your comments re trackers George<br />
why build a mechanical liability and complexity into some thing as reliable as a solar array?<br />
If you want more power just add more (now relatively cheap) P.V. panels and move on.<br />
Cost benefit analysis shows for a home system shows for the price of a tracker and its foundations you can add enough panels to a static array for near if not the same performance and best of all its KISS. I cant imagine a large commercial array such as these would be any different, maybe there are some economies of scale that have a bearing on it?  I would be surprised. The only time a tracker is warranted, I feel, is when there are space constrictions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 1/26/2012  The Next Solyndra? Amonix by George B.</title>
		<link>http://www.utterpower.com/1262012-the-next-solyndra-amonix/comment-page-1/#comment-7888</link>
		<dc:creator>George B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 19:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.utterpower.com/?p=4113#comment-7888</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s one about the Amonix magic!
http://optics.org/indepth/2/8/1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s one about the Amonix magic!<br />
<a href="http://optics.org/indepth/2/8/1" rel="nofollow">http://optics.org/indepth/2/8/1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What you need to know about small engines and ethanol blended fuels. by Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.utterpower.com/what-you-need-to-know-about-small-engines-and-ethanol-blended-fuels/comment-page-1/#comment-7887</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.utterpower.com/?p=2007#comment-7887</guid>
		<description>How can I convert a small petrol generator to ethanol without any problem.pls I need way out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can I convert a small petrol generator to ethanol without any problem.pls I need way out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 1/26/2012  The Next Solyndra? Amonix by Elden</title>
		<link>http://www.utterpower.com/1262012-the-next-solyndra-amonix/comment-page-1/#comment-7886</link>
		<dc:creator>Elden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.utterpower.com/?p=4113#comment-7886</guid>
		<description>Breaking news this a.m. Ener1 filed chapter 11 after receiving $118 million in gov&#039;t subsidies. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/01/27/parent-obama-backed-battery-maker-goes-bankrupt/
How many more lousy business decisions will be made before we wake up? I&#039;m afraid California will be &quot;too big to fail&quot; and will have to be bailed out by the Federal Government. I&#039;m glad I moved out of there, but you and I will likely pay the bills.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Breaking news this a.m. Ener1 filed chapter 11 after receiving $118 million in gov&#8217;t subsidies. <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/01/27/parent-obama-backed-battery-maker-goes-bankrupt/" rel="nofollow">http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/01/27/parent-obama-backed-battery-maker-goes-bankrupt/</a><br />
How many more lousy business decisions will be made before we wake up? I&#8217;m afraid California will be &#8220;too big to fail&#8221; and will have to be bailed out by the Federal Government. I&#8217;m glad I moved out of there, but you and I will likely pay the bills.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

